“You have opened the doors…”, said Asaduddin Owaisi on the order of the court on survey of Gyanvapi Masjid

- Advertisement -

Gyanvapi Masjid Case: How a Lower Court will go against Parliament. How will a lower court violate the SC’s judgment? Tomorrow the Supreme Court is hearing and today that area was sealed.

New Delhi:

During the survey of Gyanvapi Masjid, AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi has given a strong reaction in the case of a place being told as Shivling by the Hindu side and sealing that place by the court. Owaisi said in a special conversation with NDTV, I have been saying on this issue from the beginning, when the Babri Masjid verdict came, I had said that the court has given the decision wrong and it is a decision given on the basis of faith. You have opened the doors that again they will go and open all those things. The SC said in its judgment that the 1991 Act is part of the Constitution of India.

Gyanvapi Masjid Case: The area where Shivling was found should be sealed, orders of Varanasi Court

The AIMIM leader said, today’s court order is open textbook style. The way the Babri Masjid was snatched from the Muslims, it was a violation of the Worship Act of 1991. There the idols were kept fraudulently. At that time the DM had closed the mosque. In the time of Rajiv Gandhi, 30 page order was given without listening to the Muslim side and worship was started. How long will we continue to cheat. There is an Act of 1991 and there is a Supreme Court Judgment. In 1991, the High Court gave a stay on this demand. It is issuing stay. How would a lower court go against the parliament? How will a lower court violate the SC’s judgment? Tomorrow the Supreme Court is hearing and today that area was sealed.

SC to hear tomorrow the petition seeking a stay on Gyanvapi Masjid survey

Owaisi cautioned that the same thing happened in 1949. This is not something to stop. I am not doing politics. How does the lower court violate the Supreme Court’s decision. RSS has more than 50 thousand lists, where they say that this mosque was once a mosque. Then why did we make this act in the Parliament, why the Supreme Court gave the judgment. After all, how long will we continue to cheat like this? My hijab, my halal are in danger. You will break my shop. Now you will snatch the mosque too. Then why was the law made? This was the demand in 1991 and the stay of 1991 is still there. By bringing another party, they reach the court in October 2021. The court did not listen to the Muslim side. The Muslim side says that we do not want this survey and this commission but the court does not agree.

As soon as told that Shivling has come out. The court said, seal it and then the Deputy Chief Minister of UP is also tweeting. The world knows from his tweets. I am concerned about the Constitution of 1991 Act, so I am raising this issue. At the age of 19-20 I saw my peers how they had bad memory. Why are you taking the country on that path today? Those who are silent today, they just do not mean to take votes by intimidating the Muslims, they do not mean the mosque. I am in love with the votes of Muslims. He is not in love with the Muslims and the mosque, nor with the justice. This issue is about justice. So how will the country run? SP has lost its purpose.


Credit: ndtv.in /

- Advertisement -
Mail Us For  DMCA / Credit  Notice

Recent Articles

Stay on top - Get the daily news in your inbox

Related Stories